Hello everyone! Today, we’re diving into a detailed comparison of two popular mop vacuum cleaners: the UWANT mop vacuum cleaner and the Tineco iFloor 3 mop vacuum cleaner. I’ve put both models through their paces to test their features, suction power, and overall performance so you can decide which one fits your cleaning needs best. Let’s get started!
🛠 Docking and Charging Comparison
One of the first things to consider with mop vacuum cleaners is the docking and charging mechanism. The UWANT features a sleek, garage-style charging dock where you simply slide the cleaner in without lifting it. This design not only makes charging easier but also helps prevent water messes that can happen when lifting a wet device.
On the other hand, the Tineco requires you to lift the device onto its charging dock. This adds an extra step and increases the risk of spilling water. Additionally, the Tineco’s charger must be manually connected to the dock, whereas the UWANT offers a more seamless wireless charging experience once docked.
In this category, the UWANT clearly takes the lead for convenience and mess prevention.
🖐 Handle Design and Flexibility
The handle design plays a huge role in how comfortable and effective a mop vacuum cleaner is during use. The UWANT features a unique, bendable handle that can flex back and forth and also lock into place. This flexibility allows you to maneuver around tight corners and reach difficult spots with ease.
In contrast, the Tineco has a fixed handle, which can cause wrist fatigue after extended use and limits your range of motion. The UWANT can even be bent all the way down to the floor and across wide areas, something I’ve never seen in other mop vacuum cleaners before.
This adjustable handle design makes the UWANT a winner for those who want ergonomic versatility and better reach.
💨 Suction Power and Cleaning Performance
Testing suction with various spills like milk, ketchup, ranch dressing, and water showed that both machines perform well around corners and crevices. However, the UWANT edges out the Tineco thanks to its multiple speed modes and overall power, allowing it to clean messes faster and more efficiently.
Both models come with removable brush rolls for easy maintenance. The UWANT’s brush roll is larger and its dock is completely removable, making cleaning much simpler. The Tineco’s dock is fixed to the charging base, which can make cleaning a bit more cumbersome.
The UWANT also offers a one-touch self-cleaning feature with 60°C hot air drying, which helps eliminate odors and buildup while keeping noise levels under 74 decibels. In contrast, the Tineco’s dock remains wetter after cleaning, potentially leading to mold and unpleasant smells, and tends to be noisier.
🧼 Cleaning and Maintenance Features
One standout feature of the UWANT is its built-in deodorizing stick that combats odors even if dirty water is left inside for some time. The Tineco lacks this feature and its dirty water bin fills up faster.
Additionally, the UWANT combines the dirty water bin and solution container into a single unit, making it easier and quicker to refill and reattach. With the Tineco, you have to remove and replace both containers separately, which adds a few extra steps.
⚙️ Modes and Functionality
The UWANT shines with its variety of cleaning modes:
- Regular Mode
- Smart Mode
- Power Mode
- Turbo Mode (increased speed)
- Dry Mode (suction only)
- Volume Control for solution output (high and normal)
It even self-propels smoothly, reducing user effort during cleaning.
In contrast, the Tineco offers only basic functionality with a simple solution release button and a dry mode. It doesn’t self-propel as effectively and lacks the variety of modes that make the UWANT more adaptable to different cleaning tasks.
🔍 Overall Comparison and Final Thoughts
Both mop vacuum cleaners perform well, but they cater to slightly different needs:
- UWANT: Offers more power, better suction, adjustable handle flexibility, and a wider range of cleaning modes. Its combined dirty water and solution bin, self-cleaning hot air drying, and deodorizing stick make maintenance easier and more hygienic. It also cleans effectively under furniture thanks to its full-range handle flexibility.
- Tineco iFloor 3: Simpler design with fewer features but a longer front cleaning surface area, allowing it to cover wider messes in one pass. It’s a good choice if you want something slimmer and more straightforward.
In terms of weight, both are similar, but the UWANT’s flexibility and performance give it the edge for those looking for a more capable and versatile cleaning tool.
🧼 UWANT D100 vs Tineco iFLOOR 3 Breeze Complete:
Comparison Table
| Feature | UWANT D100 | Tineco iFLOOR 3 Breeze Complete |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | 18,000Pa (high-power suction with Smart AI) | Standard suction, no Pa rating given |
| Smart Modes | Smart AI adjusts suction & water flow + 3 manual water levels | Basic mode + dry mode, no smart adjustment |
| Docking System | Garage-style, hands-free self-cleaning + hot air drying | Basic charging dock with self-cleaning (no hot air) |
| Self-Cleaning | Yes, with hot air drying and odor stick | Yes, brush self-cleaning cycle (air drying not included) |
| Odor Control | Built-in odor removal system, effective for dirty water tank | No odor control or deodorizer |
| Water Tank System | Combined bin (clean/dirty water in one module) | Separate clean and dirty water tanks |
| Handle Flexibility | 180° lay-flat design, reaches under beds/sofas easily | Fixed handle – limited bending, hard to reach low furniture |
| Edge Cleaning | Dual-sided edge cleaning | Basic edge reach, not dual-sided |
| Noise Level | ~50 dB (very quiet) | ~80 dB (moderate noise) |
| Battery Runtime | Up to 40 minutes | Up to 30 minutes |
| Charging Time | ~5–6 hours | ~4–5 hours |
| Weight | 21 lbs | 9.26 lbs |
| Included Accessories | 2 mops, 2 HEPA filters, dock, solution | 2 rollers, 2 solutions, filter, cleaning tool, dock |
| Ideal Use Case | Heavy-duty messes, pet households, under furniture cleaning | Lighter daily cleaning, small to medium areas |
| Customer Rating (Amazon) | ★★★☆☆ (3.6 from 18 reviews) | ★★★★☆ (4.1 from 33,000+ reviews) |
| Price (at last availability) | Latest Price Amazon | Latest Price Amazon |
| Warranty & Support Issues | Some users reported poor customer support | Strong brand support via Amazon and Tineco |
✅ Summary:
-
Choose UWANT if you want more power, odor control, quiet operation, and advanced cleaning modes.
-
Choose Tineco if you prefer a reliable, lightweight cleaner with easier handling and better brand support.
❓ FAQ
Which mop vacuum cleaner is easier to maintain?
The UWANT is easier to maintain due to its removable dock, combined dirty water and solution bin, and one-touch self-cleaning with hot air drying. The Tineco requires more manual handling with separate bins and a fixed dock.
Does the UWANT have better suction power than the Tineco?
Yes, the UWANT outperforms the Tineco in suction power and offers multiple speed modes for more effective cleaning.
Can both mop vacuums clean under furniture?
The UWANT excels at cleaning under furniture thanks to its flexible handle that bends all the way to the floor, while the Tineco tends to lift up and loses contact, limiting its reach.
Are there any noise differences between the two?
The UWANT operates quieter thanks to its hot air drying system keeping noise under 74 decibels. The Tineco tends to be noisier, especially when the dock remains wet.
Which mop vacuum is better for odor control?
The UWANT includes a built-in deodorizing stick to combat odors and prevent mold, while the Tineco lacks this feature and may develop odors if dirty water is left inside.
🔗 Where to Buy
If you’re interested in purchasing either mop vacuum cleaner, here are some helpful links:
Both machines have their merits depending on your cleaning preferences, but if you want versatility, power, and convenience, the UWANT is a strong contender. For a simpler, slim design with a wider cleaning path, the Tineco is worth considering.
